<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Blatant Sexism of Cooking Mama and Science Papa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.nerve.com/61fps/2009/05/14/the-blatant-sexism-of-cooking-mama-and-science-papa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.nerve.com/61fps/2009/05/14/the-blatant-sexism-of-cooking-mama-and-science-papa/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AlexB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.nerve.com/61fps/2009/05/14/the-blatant-sexism-of-cooking-mama-and-science-papa/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 02:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.nerve.com/61fps/?p=608#comment-154</guid>
		<description>VGCats, huh. Mmm. 

I'm in agreement with Roto, here. I mean, I guess it could be mildly offensive, but since it's a different company, I dunno. I'm mostly flabbergasted that the other company is so blatantly riding on Cooking Mama's success.

I don't know. My girlfriend isn't much of a girly girl, she certainly doesn't think women just belong in the kitchen, but she found Cooking Mama to be charming and fun. I played the devil's advocate and argued it may be a bit sexist, and she thought I was being a doofus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VGCats, huh. Mmm. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m in agreement with Roto, here. I mean, I guess it could be mildly offensive, but since it&#8217;s a different company, I dunno. I&#8217;m mostly flabbergasted that the other company is so blatantly riding on Cooking Mama&#8217;s success.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know. My girlfriend isn&#8217;t much of a girly girl, she certainly doesn&#8217;t think women just belong in the kitchen, but she found Cooking Mama to be charming and fun. I played the devil&#8217;s advocate and argued it may be a bit sexist, and she thought I was being a doofus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roto13</title>
		<link>http://blogs.nerve.com/61fps/2009/05/14/the-blatant-sexism-of-cooking-mama-and-science-papa/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Roto13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 01:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.nerve.com/61fps/?p=608#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Also, you suck are resizing images.

Photoshop Mama?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, you suck are resizing images.</p>
<p>Photoshop Mama?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roto13</title>
		<link>http://blogs.nerve.com/61fps/2009/05/14/the-blatant-sexism-of-cooking-mama-and-science-papa/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Roto13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 01:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.nerve.com/61fps/?p=608#comment-152</guid>
		<description>I'd be more inclined to worry about sexism in this if Science Papa was actually from the Cooking Mama guys. If they actually went "Hey, let's make a Mama game about science. Except Mama is a woman and women are only good for housework and popping out babies, so we should probably have her husband do it."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be more inclined to worry about sexism in this if Science Papa was actually from the Cooking Mama guys. If they actually went &#8220;Hey, let&#8217;s make a Mama game about science. Except Mama is a woman and women are only good for housework and popping out babies, so we should probably have her husband do it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
