7

Fruit Bats Engage In More Foreplay Than Most Americans

bat cat kiss Fruit Bats Engage In More Foreplay Than Most Americans
For the first time in history, adult animals besides homo sapiens have been found to engage in the act of fellatio before, or sometimes in lieu of, sex. And no, the animals aren’t monkeys, although the Chinese Zoology study does point out that young a chimpanzee may sometimes engage in the behavior of giving head. The animal isn’t even a mammal [Oops! Mistake fixed. - Ed.]. It’s a bat…man.
From the MSNBC.Com article:

Intriguingly, the female lowered her head to lick the male penis during 14 of 20 copulations recorded on video. The licking typically went on for some 19 seconds, or roughly one-twelfth the average time of copulation. The male never withdrew from the female when she performed fellatio.

So what’s the biological purpose of all these b.j.’s? “The bats spent twice as long copulating when oral sex was involved than when not.” And although Chinese researchers are still scratching their heads over what that could mean, it might prove to be a game-changer in our commonly held misconception that only certain animals have sex for pleasure.

And if you are just dying to watch bats go down on each other and can’t wait for the next episode of The Vampire Diaries, here’s your link to the explicit video of bat blowjobs.

pixelstats trackingpixel

Share this article:




7 Comments

‘The animal isn’t even a mammal. It’s a bat…man.’ !!! What? Are you serious?

JD commented on Nov 02 09 at 4:11 pm

Dusk! With a creepy tingling sensation, you hear the fluttering of leathery wings! BATS! With glowing red eyes and glistening fangs, these unspeakable giant bugs….

Luke commented on Nov 02 09 at 4:41 pm

Bonobos, or pygmy chimpanzees, engage in oral sex all the time. They use it to settle disputes, which is as good a recipe for a long and happy life as I’ve heard.

Geebee commented on Nov 02 09 at 5:24 pm

Yeah, but bonobos may as well be people. Well, idealized people maybe. Bats, now, that’s much more interesting (and yes, biblically not mammals either).

thinkywritey commented on Nov 03 09 at 11:20 am

(and yes, biblically not mammals either).

What the fuck does that mean? There are no mammals in the bible at all because the bible is not a scientific work — I doubt there is even a word for mammal as we understand it in the whole frigging book. “not biblically mammals” is on par with saying “according to the this book of knock-knock jokes, eatin’ ain’t cheatin’!”

Luke commented on Nov 03 09 at 11:34 am

Luke > “Bats aren’t Bugs!” ( I love Calvin)

ketut commented on Nov 04 09 at 10:32 am

Luke? Calm down… then read Leviticus 11 (KJV). I didn’t claim it was *accurate*; I was actually being ironic.

thinkywritey commented on Nov 04 09 at 11:01 am

Add a Comment